Friday, August 25, 2006

A Rose Bowl by any other name

In addition to the changes in nomenclature of certain schools with Native American nicknames is coming another change: the BCS national championship game has chosen to become anonymous. Though the game will be played in the metro Phoenix area this year, it will not be the Fiesta Bowl (that bowl will, as JoePa notes below, still be a BCS bowl, and will take place a week before the title game). It will simply be called "the BCS National Championship Game."

In a sport that is so rich in tradition, this change should be very unwelcome. Names like Rose, Sugar, Orange, Cotton, Sun, and Gator have long been a part of the college football and New Year's Day lexicon. To make the biggest college game of the year a game without a name is a tragedy of epic proportions. The 2 for 1 in the same city was workable: just let each city come up with a new name for a new bowl. Now, college football is without a moniker even to match "The Final Four" or "The College World Series." The sport that invented tradition has now abandoned it.

If the BCS persists in wanting a single name for its title game regardless of city, then I have a modest proposal: call it "The Orrin Hatch Bowl." As JoePa mentoned below, the primary reason for the creation of the 5th BCS bowl game was the fear of Congressional intervention, and Hatch, the meddlesome Mormon from Utah, was the primary agitator in support thereof. So, if we're going to wreck a century of tradition, let's at least pay homage to the man who made us wreck it.

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

In Memoriam: Cecil Pryor, DE, 1968-1969

Cecil Pryor, one of the mainstays of the defense of Bo's first team in 1969, passed away 11 months ago on September 13, 2005. He played Defensive End and started all 11 games during the 1969 season. One thing I'll always remember about Cecil is the story that his teammate Jim Brandstatter recounted in the book he authored, "Tales from Michigan Stadium." Brandstatter recounted that as Michigan prepared for the 1970 Rose Bowl that the NBC television network came to campus to tape the player introductions. Back then the starters were taped at their home campus and they would stand in front of the camera and state their name, year in school, hometown, and major area of study. When it was Cecil's turn in front of the camera, Brandstatter recounted that Cecil looked directly into the camera and with a serious look said, "Cecil Pryor, defensive end, Corpus Christi, Texas, senior, majoring in nuclear physics." The thing is Cecil was not a nuclear physics major nor had he ever been to the physics building during his four years in Ann Arbor. The team did not find out about the joke that Cecil had pulled until they had returned from Pasadena after the game had been played. After graduation, Cecil went on to co-own a Ford dealership in southeast Michigan. One of his three daughters followed him athletically as a Wolverine as she was an outside hitter on the Michigan volleyball team in 1997 and 1998. Cecil's memorial service was held at the U of M Golf Course in October, 2005. He was 58 years old at the time of his death. Go Blue.

Friday, August 11, 2006

Rose Bowl loss to Texas all but forgotten by USC

Ivan MaiselESPN.comLOS ANGELES -- So where are the grief counselors? The hollow-eyed looks? What happened to lying awake at nights, counting how many times Vince Young jumped over their beds?

It has been three months since the USC Trojans lost the chance to win a third consecutive national championship, three months since they lost after 34 straight victories. They lost a game they had been expected to win. They lost with 19 seconds to play. They lost after some national network wondered aloud, and incessantly, whether they were the best team ever.

It wasn't just that USC lost 41-38 to Texas in the BCS Championship Game. It was the way it lost. No one put more athletic talent on the field than the Trojans -- that is, until Young made Southern California look like a directional school. The Longhorns' quarterback threw for 267 yards, rushed for 200 yards and broke about 200 tackles.

USC had a 12-point lead with 4:04 to play. It had a five-point lead with 20 seconds to play. Twenty seconds, not even the length of a Dick Vitale sentence. And with one Young stutter step, it all vanished in the right front corner of the end zone.

The Trojans had history in their hands, and they let it slip through. A victory in the Rose Bowl would have raised the possibility of a challenge to Oklahoma's record of 47 consecutive victories, the Holy Grail of college football records.

That's the kind of loss that would stick with most people. After Penn State lost to Alabama, 14-7, in the 1979 Sugar Bowl, Nittany Lions coach Joe Paterno blew the following season while mourning the loss.

"I have talked about getting angry with myself when I lose. Nothing of the kind ever compared to this loss," Paterno wrote in his 1989 autobiography. "I beat up on myself not only immediately but for months afterward, halfway into the next season."

Lose a game like that, and the coaches are liable to remind you for the next eight months. Coaches have been known to post losing scores in the weight room as a motivational ploy. They want their team to be so sick about what happened that the players will do whatever it takes to get that damn score out of their heads.

It doesn't take long to figure out the toll the Rose Bowl loss took on USC. You don't have to be around the returning Trojans very long to measure it. Watching one spring practice at Howard Jones Field lays it out.

Nothing.

Not a trace.

"I actually just watched it on TV the other day for the first time," junior linebacker Keith Rivers said. "I was sitting around and decided to take a look."

And?

"I didn't watch the last couple of minutes," Rivers said.

Denial -- always a good tool. But Rivers said that's not what he meant.

"We just missed a lot of tackles and plays we should have made," he said. "Instead of 2 yards, they were getting 4 or 5 or 10. … Sometimes, the game doesn't go the way you want. Everybody played hard. I guess you can kind of rationalize it. You just put it behind you. We're still a good team. If we're going to lead next year, we got to get back to work."

There's not a trace of anguish in Rivers' voice. The history major might as well be outlining the Compromise of 1850 for one of his professors.

"You gotta bounce back," offensive tackle Sam Baker said. "You can't dwell on the past. That happens in the Super Bowl, too. All the [losing] teams in the Super Bowl struggle the next year. That's not going to be us. We're going to go back and work just like we've always worked. It's really not about one game."

And that is where the mark of Pete Carroll can be seen on these Trojans, as clear as the lightning bolt on Harry Potter's forehead. The Rose Bowl, as big as it was, amounted to one game, same as the previous 34. USC did the best it could do, and for the first time in nearly three seasons, it wasn't enough.

"The way we handled that fits right hand in hand with our philosophy," Carroll said after practice the other evening. "I think our system, the way we do stuff, the way we talk, from day one, A to Z, prepares us to deal with whether you win or whether you lose that game. Not that we accept it, any of it. Not that we would think we were the greatest thing in the world if we won. To me, I think the mark of a great championship player, or a great championship program, is the ability to continue to show who you are and not be affected by what's going on around you, or in the past, or what you're heading into."

Carroll has made the Trojans think like recovering alcoholics -- one day at a time. Get better today. Compete today. Win your job today. His players have bought into it.

"He does a great job, always in the mind-set of a positive direction," senior center Ryan Kalil said of Carroll. "We came back, and he called a meeting. You would have thought we won that game, the way his attitude was, just kind of the way he was glowing about it. There's nothing we can do about it. It's over with, and the only thing now we can do is go back to our basics, starting with our offseason."

That philosophy might be easier to instill in Los Angeles. All the distractions that might tempt a player also tempt the fans. The city, much less the entire state, didn't go into mourning the way an Oklahoma did a year ago. The Trojans don't run into disappointment everywhere they turn. The spotlight is diffused. That helps Carroll achieve his goal.

But even if it didn't, Carroll is adamant that one night won't disrupt what he hopes to accomplish.

"I'm not going to let that game affect us, if there is anything I can do about it," he said. "We were about two inches away from everybody thinking the opposite of what happened. It was just a lunge here, a lunge there, this or that, that separates the difference. They're [Texas] great champions. We played our tails off. We had plenty of chances to win the game. We made a team play great. That's what I've always said, if they are going to beat us, make them play great. If that's what it took, we'll move on."

It takes enormous willpower to quiet the competitive juices and not run those missed tackles over and over again on the video. Carroll said he waited several weeks to cue up the loss.

"I was real disappointed in the game," he said. "We had plenty of chances to win the football game. It could have happened a million ways. I didn't like what we did on defense in the game in general. I was just disappointed we didn't handle them better. And I certainly think their quarterback had a great deal to do with it. He was awesome, and he looked like he looked in a lot of other games. Normally, we take great pride in making people looking normal. He looked extraordinary.

"All that?" Carroll summed up. "We're up by 12 with a few minutes left and didn't win the game, you know?

"That's the part that would drive most people nuts," I said.

Carroll looked at me for a moment, and his one-sentence reply revealed how, for all the big-picture thinking, there's a part of him that understands exactly how Paterno felt.

"So you're saying you can't tell if it is or not, huh?" he asked.

Maybe a few of those nights have been sleepless after all.

Thursday, August 03, 2006

A Rose Bowl by any other name

In addition to the changes in nomenclature of certain schools with Native American nicknames is coming another change: the BCS national championship game has chosen to become anonymous. Though the game will be played in the metro Phoenix area this year, it will not be the Fiesta Bowl (that bowl will, as JoePa notes below, still be a BCS bowl, and will take place a week before the title game). It will simply be called "the BCS National Championship Game."

In a sport that is so rich in tradition, this change should be very unwelcome. Names like Rose, Sugar, Orange, Cotton, Sun, and Gator have long been a part of the college football and New Year's Day lexicon. To make the biggest college game of the year a game without a name is a tragedy of epic proportions. The 2 for 1 in the same city was workable: just let each city come up with a new name for a new bowl. Now, college football is without a moniker even to match "The Final Four" or "The College World Series." The sport that invented tradition has now abandoned it.

If the BCS persists in wanting a single name for its title game regardless of city, then I have a modest proposal: call it "The Orrin Hatch Bowl." As JoePa mentoned below, the primary reason for the creation of the 5th BCS bowl game was the fear of Congressional intervention, and Hatch, the meddlesome Mormon from Utah, was the primary agitator in support thereof. So, if we're going to wreck a century of tradition, let's at least pay homage to the man who made us wreck it.

Monday, July 31, 2006

Looking Back: 2005 Season, Part III

Welcome to the third and final part of Looking Back. In this edition of Looking Back I've featured the 2005 season. In total, I attended five games during the '05 season. Part I featured the disappointing collapse against Ohio State and a big win on the road at Northwestern. Part II featured the most exciting game all year; a last-second victory against an undefeated Penn State team. That brings us to part III. Part III will feature a very tough loss to Notre Dame and also the home opener against Northern Illinois. Let's not waste any time and get right into the reviews.

**September 10, 2005 - #3 Michigan: 10 vs. #20 Notre Dame: 17
Every year there's an early game in a season that will tell you how your year will turn out. Sort of a swing game you could say. Year after year Michigan hasn't come out on top in these swing games, mostly because they're against great teams and are on the road. Mind you, that's no excuse, but finally a chance to prove themselves at home.

Even though it was at home, Michigan's own mistakes was just too much. Notre Dame took advantage and came out on top with a 17-10 win. Michigan had their opportunities all day long. Two plays on the 1-yard line ended up just becoming a fumble. With that fumble and also two other blown redzone appearances, Michigan couldn't comeback and prevent the upset.

Notre Dame came out to a fast start. On the first drive the Fighting Irish marched right down the field without even having to convert one third down. The explosive drive ended on a 5-yard touchdown reception by Rhema McKnight. Michigan didn't answer back until early in the second quarter when Garrett Rivas converted a 38-yard field goal. Notre Dame padded the lead with a touchdown pass to Jeff Samardzija. At the half, Michigan was probably lucky to just be down by eleven points as the game was definitely one-sided.

Nobody scored in the third quarter, which meant that Michigan would need a late comeback. Notre Dame didn't help that cause as Notre Dame added three points after a field goal with fourteen minutes remaining. With six minutes to go Michigan had a brief look at success. Jason Avant took a reception on fourth down all the way to the ND 1-yard line, and probably would've scored if it wouldn't have been for a missed block by Doug Dutch. This is when everything just crumbled down.

Chad Henne tried a QB sneak on first down and was stuffed, or it appeared that he was. The officials reviewed the play and nothing changed. Stop me once, shame on you; stop me twice, shame on me. Henne came out and did the same exact thing, except this time fumbled the ball into ND hands. The play was reviewed, but nothing changed. The student section proceeded to throw water bottles onto the field in disgust, which didn't help at all.

Michigan was just way too over matched when it came down to the bottom line. A late 25-yard touchdown pass to Mario Manningham got the Wolverines within seven, but didn't mean much as Michigan failed on a fourth and long at the very end of the game to give Notre Dame the ball and the win.

**September 3, 2005 - #4 Michigan: 33 vs. Northern Illinois: 17
Ahh, the first game of the 2005 season. The time when everyone's hopes were high, and the expectations were for a great season. This is the only time when everyone is as good as each other. Michigan had the now traditional matchup with a MAC opponent who was not one to look down on. A Northern Illinois team came in, and although they would not come out on top, they caused some minor worries with the Michigan fans.

Jason Avant opened up the scoring on the first drive with a 4-yard touchdown reception from Chad Henne. Northern Illinois answered back with a short field goal before Michigan got on the board again with a 34-yard screen pass to Mike Hart for a touchdown.

The biggest play of the game for NIU came soon after in the second quarter when running back Garrett Wolfe took a 76-yard run to the house. But, that would be all that NIU could get. Even though the game quickly turned into a 33-17 blowout in Michigan's favor, some questions were raised. The game was actually closer then the score reveals because of five costly NIU turnovers. Michigan allowed over 400 yards of total offense, which caused some concern. Even though it didn't show a week later when Michigan came out pretty strong after a rough first half against Notre Dame, it was a hot topic on the post game radio shows.
This wraps up the 2005 season. Tomorrow will kickoff Looking Back at the 2004 season, which will all be started off by possibly the most exciting loss ever. A game with such bad defense that the holes in Michigan's defense may still be there. Of course, I'm talking about the Rose Bowl, against the now national champion Texas Longhorns. Stay tuned for the review.

Monday, July 24, 2006

For All the Daughters Who are Their Father's Sons

In honor of Father's Day, I'm sharing the following essay with Latina Lista readers. It was written several years ago after my father died and published in local newspapers. I soon discovered that there were mas hijas (more daughters) like me.

A lot has been written about the father-son bond. Documentaries have been produced, books have been written, academic papers have been published, and talk shows even have devoted full hours to discussing the topic.

Yet hardly anyone discusses the father-daughter relationship - at least in a positive light. The only time you hear about the father-daughter bond, it seems, is when it has been violated.

Maybe that is why those of us who have had good relationships with our dads have come to regard them as very special attachments.

Being my father's daughter, and the oldest of two girls, meant juggling my mother's demand for lady-like manners with my dad's desire to share his keen appreciation of sports.

Instead of being called "Daddy's Girl," I was lovingly referred to as "Moose." And while my friends spent Saturdays sprawled in front of a blaring television, enjoying music dance shows, I adjusted the volume on play-by-plays crackling from the radio while Dad switched from muted TV channel to muted TV channel, watching snippets of all the televised games.

Being my father's daughter, I learned how hellish the Korean War was. I heard how a 19-year-old left his studies at the University of Michigan and his dreams of playing one more time in the Rose Bowl as a Wolverine to enlist in the Air Force and fight in a battle that has become known as the "Forgotten War."

While my friends enjoyed lazy sun-soaking afternoons, I trekked up blistering metal ladders to get a three-minute peek into the cockpits of parked jets at the annual air shows at the local Air Force base.

Summer evenings were reserved for my dad's makeshift detachment, composed of my sister and me, marching around the neighborhood block, following my dad's lead and keeping step with boot camp tunes.

Being my father's daughter, I learned that the sun wasn't always your friend. It was a hard lesson to abide by when we lived in Florida.

Fair-skinned, Dad would erupt with fever blisters if he challenged the noonday heat. So, before dawn, we all piled into the family car and cruised the deserted bridges until we came to our private, palm-tree-framed stretch of beach. With blankets, towels, shovels, snorkels and goggles in tow, we shuffled through the cool sand until we found the perfect spot not too far from the surf.

Once we laid out the blanket, we donned our snorkels and goggles and screamed as we dived into the icy water- just us, the fish and the seagulls.

Being by father's daughter, I learned that big men do cry over the silliest of things. When I was little, the theme music from the TV show Lassie could make me unleash a flood of tears. The picture of that collie, with her paw hanging in midair, struck a sensitive chord in me - and my dad. We would point and laugh at each other as tears streamed down our faces.

Being my father's daughter, I developed an appreciation of fresh Krispy Kreme doughnuts. Weekends were special when Dad drove us across town just to get a fresh batch of those glazed delicacies.

When the first outlet of the popular doughnut chain opened last year 25 miles from us, I was excited. Neither my husband nor my kids could understand why I would be so thrilled to have yet one more temptation to break my diet, but Dad did.

Being my father's daughter, I learned never to stop believing. Dad was an entrepreneur who put gusto and faith into every one of his endeavors, even when they didn't pan out.

But he never stopped believing.

His last project was putting all of his faith into a stock that hadn't risen more than 3 points from when he bought it more than a year ago. He kept vigil on the company as diligently as my mom, sister and I did at his bedside when he passed away in April.

The week after Dad died, the stock began climbing steadily. It continues to gain.
I believe it will go even higher.

I am my father's daughter.

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Thoughts Regarding the Recent News from USCland

Of everything I have read or heard, I think that USC's biggest concern is not Reggie Bush. I think they should be most concerned about Winston Justice's possible ties to the alleged sports agents at New Era.

That's not to say there will be nothing there on the Reggie Bush investigation, but my guess is that the NCAA will have a difficult time tying the University to what happened with the Griffin House, for a number of reasons.

First, keep in mind that Reggie Bush actually interned at a Sports Marketing Rep's office last summer -- coincidently, the office of Mike Ornstein, who currently is Bush marketing rep (as opposed to his sports agent). While that might raise eyebrows, one thing it tells me is that there is no way Ornstien would have let Bush get himself into a situation where any sports agent (particularly a Hobo Show like "New Era Sports") could claim that Bush had signed with him prior to his declaring himself for the draft. Of course, anything is possible, but I seriously doubt that there is any kind of paper trail tying Bush to the New Era guys. What you will then have is a swearing contest between Bush, who'll say he knew the guys, one of whom was a friend of his step-father, but never had any agreement with them and knew nothing about the financial arrangement with respect to the house, and the New Era guys who have said they did have a deal with Bush. On the swearing contest, though, the guy from New Era who claims to have had the deal with Bush has a criminal record, and has millions of dollars in incentives to lie. If you can't show Bush signed with an agent, and you can't show he had any knowledge of the financial arrangement with respect to the house, you won't be able to tie the University with knowledge of the arrangement, barrinig some unexpected connection (like a direct communication with a coach regarding the situation).

You can see the defense already. Bush has denied knowing anything about the financial terms of the hosue. His spokesman went so far as to say Bush had only been to the house once in the 13 month period his mother lived there. While it seems hard to believe that a son who lived only a few hours away would only visit his mother's house once in 13 months, Bush is not a typical college kid, and spent much of that time in school and having practice, working in Santa Monica in the summer, and getting ready for the Rose Bowl over the Holidays, so it is plausible. On another level, there is more "plausible deniability" built in if he stayed away from the house, and again, he had very good advisors who might have suspected something and advised him to stay away.

Pete Carroll has stated he had no knowledge of Bush's mother and step-father's living situation. Again, on its face, that seems plausible. However, considering the level of agent interest that had to have been swirling around Bush and his family, and considering Carroll's public comments about how careful he to advise players to stay away from agents, his radar certainly had to be way up. It will interesting to see if Carroll was aware that the Griffin's had moved into a new house, or if there was other evidence of significant lifestyle changes in the family that were apparent to others. However, that alone would not prove he knew (but the NCAA could impose minor sanctions for SC not investigating the matter further).

Overall, though, considering the credibility problems of the New Era guys, the plausible deniability on the University's part, and the likely lack of any paper trail, I do not expect anything serious to come from HouseGate.

However, the bits of information about Winston Justice's possible dealings with the same New Era people may turn out to be a different story. I have not seen much focus on those in the news, but I expect more to come. I'm not sure that Justice would have been as careful as Bush in his dealings. Further, although there is still a credibility issue regarding the New Era guys, Justice could have credibility issues as well. Further, the benefits allegedly provided to Justice (although much smaller than living rent free for a year in a $700,000 house) will likely be verifiable via records and other witnesses, and there is no "plausible deniability" regarding his knowledge of the benefits, as he allegedly received them personally. Who knows how it will shake out.

With respect to today's reports regarding an arrest of a USC player for sexual assault, we'll have to wait and see what happens. People should not read too much into the bail amount. At this stage, no formal charges have been filed, so the bail amount is not so much a reflection of the weight of the evidence, but rather is fixed from the nature of the arrest (suspicion of rape) and possible enhancements pursuant to the LA County Felony Bail Schedule. It does not mean that the DA's office has even looked at the case, and in fact, in this situation, it is unlikely that anyone from the DA's office had anything to do with the bail amount. What can be read into it is that the potential charge is very serious (I think that the bail amount for rape is $100,000, so if the amount was indeed $200,000 there may be some potential additional charges or enhancements). However, because the player made bail, charges will not have to be filed immediately, and may never be filed.

There are likely only two people who know what really happened regarding the assault allegations and I have no insights whatsoever and the allegations in and of themselves do not tar USC any more than similar allegations that have been made against other students at other Universities tar those Universities. On matter of note, however, will be how the University handles the situation. When Notre Dame had four players facing sexual assault allegations a few years back, the University proceed with its own investigation, separate and apart from any criminal investigation. The University held hearings at which the players accused were required to give statements. If they refused to do so (by asserting their Fifth Amendment rights, as they had a privilege to do), that assertion would be used against them (unlike a criminal proceeding) and they would be expelled. Thus, they faced the Hobbesian choice of potentially incriminating themselves (even if they denied wrongdoing, simply admitting presence at the location is incriminating and could be used in a subsequent prosecution) to tell their side of the story, or remain silent and face certain expulsion. Some did tell their side of the story, they were all expelled nonetheless, and in the one criminal prosecution that went to trial (which resulted in an aquittal of all felony counts and a conviction on a misdemeanor, resulting in probation), the player's statements to the University in the disciplinary hearing was used against him by the State in the criminal trial (as I recall, all other criminal charges against the remaining three players were dropped due to insufficient evidence, but they remained expelled).

I don't know USC's procedures. However, I do recall an incident last year where the LAPD found over 100 ecstacy pills in an apartment shared by two USC players. No charges were filed because the police could not determine which of the two the pills belonged to. I don't know how USC handled the matter internally, but I don't recall reading that the players were required to answer questions about who's pills they were (on penalty of expulsion if the refused to answer). I recall one of the players did face some repercussion (he also faced allegations of assault) and transferred to UNLV, and the other player is expected to vie for a starting position in the fall.

All in all, a difficult situation for everyone involved.